Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
Dog Control Bill stalls in Parliament
Bill not likely to be in next Queen's Speech

The Dog Control Bill, a proposed replacement for the much-criticised Dangerous Dogs Act 1989, subsequent Amendments to the Act and similar legislation, has stalled after the First Reading in the House of Commons and there is no indication that the Bill will progress any further in the immediate future. The proposed Bill includes the repeal of legislation specific to breeds, the creation of Dog Control Notices and the extension of the scope of the law to include private property, and was first put forward as a Private Members Bill by Lord Redesdale (Lib).

Demand for changes to legislation for the control of dangerous dogs has been strong for some time. All of the major political parties, many leading charities, many local authorities, and a broad range of veterinary and animal welfare organisations have called for changes in the law, and a petition calling for a new Bill to be included in the Queen's Speech has garnered over 10,000 signatures.

Commenting, Caroline Nokes MP (Con), who also sponsored the Bill, said “Banning the Pit Bull Terrier in 1991 was a huge mistake; creating a picture to the general public that certain breeds of dog are dangerous and others not is hugely irresponsible. The media has also played its part in demonising certain breeds and making people afraid of them, which has served no purpose but to make them even more attractive to the wrong kinds of people who do not think twice about flouting the law. If the law was working owners of dangerous dogs would be brought to account already, however in most cases they are not. Doing away with breed specific legislation and introducing genuinely preventative measures that focus on the other end of the lead, dog owners themselves, would remove the attraction that these dogs currently have”.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Vets launch new podcast for pet owners

News Story 1
 Two independent vets have launched a podcast to help owners strengthen their bond with pets. Dr Maggie Roberts and Dr Vanessa Howie, who have worked in both veterinary practice and major charities, are keen to use their experience to enable people to give pets a better life.

The venture, called Vets Talking Pets, provides advice and information on a range of topics, including how to select a suitable pet, where to obtain them and how to get the best out of your vet. Maggie and Vanessa will also discuss sensitive subjects, including end-of-life care, raw food diets and the cost of veterinary care.

The podcast can be found on all the usual podcast sites, including Podbean, Apple, Amazon Music and YouTube. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
VMD issues guidance on AVM-GSL packaging

The Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) has shared advice on its requirements for medicines considered AVM-GSL.

The guidance explains the information that should be on the outer package, and sets out the typical maximum pack size for an AVM-GSL product. It also describes the user-friendly language, structure and phrases required on packaging and product leaflets.

AVM-GSL products do not require discussion between the purchaser and a veterinary professional. This means that clear product information is needed to support sales choices.

The information will be useful for submitting new products to the AVM-GSL category and lowering the distribution category of products from NFA-VPS to AVM-GSL.

The VMD's guidance can be accessed here.