Leading dog charities deeply concerned for dog laws
All three charities feel the current Government are all discursive talk but no action. They are united in their criticism against the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) for their lack of direct response or feedback.
Earlier this month, the debate held in the House of Commons appeared promising however, little has been done despite the fact that 78% of respondents agreed dog legislation needed amendments. Furthermore, the debate saw a strikingly high 84% agree to seek compulsory micro-chipping for all pets, which would help all charities when faced with hundreds of stray or lost dogs.
Steve Goody, The Blue Cross Director of External Affairs stated: "Animal charities are struggling with huge numbers of unwanted dogs and cats, partly fuelled by irresponsible and indiscriminate breeding. The Blue Cross is calling on the Government to crack down on back-street breeding, and to promote neutering as widely as possible."
Evidently, the issue of dangerous dogs and irresponsible breeding will not be solved until the Government add more severity to their laws for dog breeding and general dog keeping. As witnessed from their vigorous debates in Parliament, they have the will to make change, but seem to be lacking in will power. Thus, Battersea, RSCPA, and The Blue Cross are forming a united front to urge the Government to be more pro-active as opposed to reactive, by making this social issue high priority. Consequently, the Government and various public services (charities, the police and social services) can crack down on irresponsible breeding and care of dogs.
FIVP has shared a survey, inviting those working in independent practice to share their views on the CMA's proposed remedies.
