New Code of Conduct: a step too far?
With the new code of conduct for veterinary surgeons still at consultation stage, MRCVS News has been receiving feedback from members expressing concern.
However reports indicate that formal feedback to the RCVS has been disappointing. Indeed, there are those that question if the process by which these consultations are conducted have contributed to the poor numbers of veterinary professionals entering into dialogue with the RCVS.
From our own feedback, it would appear that many feel the new code is a step too far and places extra pressure on an already stretched profession. There is also wide spread feeling that the code now grants the RCVS greater control and could result in a system of increased regulations. Should the RCVS have more power within the veterinary profession?
A new inclusion that is startling members of MRCVS.co.uk puts "greater responsibility" onto partners and directors to ensure their staff adhere to the code. This could mean that a veterinary surgeon is disciplined for failing to act on the suspicion that another member of staff is incompetent.
This raises a number of issues, particularly regarding the level of responsibility expected and begs the question "what consequences will veterinary owners face if individual staff do not comply?"
Will this new inclusion shift responsibility? Some vets are now worried that the new code could make it easier for practices owned by non-vets as these individuals are "untouchable" by the RCVS.
Your views concerning the new code of conduct are vital, as it will effect the way in which you and your staff work. You can send us your feedback by emailing editor@mrcvs.co.uk.
FIVP has shared a survey, inviting those working in independent practice to share their views on the CMA's proposed remedies.
