Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
EmailIphone Application    Posted: 5th August 2024
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.
Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

NOAH responds to CMA issues statement
Regulations surrounding prescription medication impacts how veterinary practices can describe options.
The trade association explained how VMPs are regulated.

The National Office for Animal Health (NOAH) has published its response to the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA’s) issues statement.

In its letter NOAH explains how veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) are regulated, and the pricing of VMPs is decided across the industry.

Through NOAH’s Code of Practice, as well as Veterinary Medicines Regulations, companies are prohibited from promoting prescription products to the public. As such, NOAH explains that companies may be restricted in the extent they can inform pet owners of their choices, if such choices relate to prescription-only products.

NOAH describes how the animal health industry has no involvement in the pricing of veterinary medicines for the public. While the animal health industry does decide upon the prices which prescribing veterinary practices and wholesalers pay, it does not devise the prices which pet owners then pay.

The trade association explains that many owners may also not understand that prescriptions can be fulfilled in online pharmacies or other veterinary practices. It suggests that greater publicity on this matter may benefit clients.

NOAH also explains how medicine regulation and the involvement of the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) affects the medicine market.

This includes the lengthy and expensive process of developing an animal medicine, and the four classifications under which veterinary medicines can be sold.

NOAH calls the veterinary medicines sector a ‘comparatively small industry’, in that the case for producing a veterinary medicine is dependent on them being used ahead of human medicines and unauthorised products.

Dawn Howard, NOAH chief executive, said: “We appreciate the CMA’s attention to the veterinary sector and the opportunity to provide our perspective. The veterinary medicines industry and veterinarians are essential in safeguarding animal health and welfare, and it is crucial that any regulatory changes consider the unique aspects of how our sector and veterinary practices operate.

“NOAH is committed to working with the CMA to ensure that the needs of pet owners, as well as the professional and economic realities of the animal health industry and veterinary practices, are met.”

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
RCVS pays tribute to well-loved equine vet

The RCVS and the Riding Establishments Subcommittee has paid tribute to well-loved veterinary surgeon and riding establishment inspector, Rebecca Hamilton-Fletcher MRCVS.

Linda Belton MRCVS, RCVS President, said: "I, along with my colleagues on the RESC, RCVS Council, RCVS Standards Committee, as well as RCVS staff, was very saddened to hear of the sudden death of Rebecca, or Becca as we knew her, last week.

"She was a true advocate for equine welfare and in her many years on the RESC worked to continually improve the quality and consistency of riding establishment inspections, all in the interests of enhanced horse welfare and rider safety."