Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Dogs understand pointing better than cats, study finds
Dogs remained motivated throughout the test, while cats became less willing to choose.
Cats were also less likely to make choices.

The findings of a study have suggested that dogs may be better at understanding hand gestures, such as pointing, than cats are.

New research conducted by Eötvös Loránd University, compared how well dogs and cats responded to human pointing gestures when completing an object choice task.

The study involved domestic cats and dogs being offered a choice of two boxes, one of which contained a food reward. An experimenter then pointed to the container with the food, before the animals chose a container.

A total of 21 small-sized dogs and 32 companion cats took part in the study, with more feline subjects being assessed in anticipation of them dropping out of the study. Forty-three cats arrived for the pointing test initially, however nine were excluded for various reasons – including refusing to leave their box, failing a motivation test and biting their owner.

Both the cats and the dogs were allowed a habituation process to familiarise themselves with the laboratory conditions and the experimenter.

The animal was then held by its owner, only being released once the experimenter had gestured towards the correct container. They were then assessed on whether they made a correct, incorrect or no choice.

The trial was conducted 28 times, with optional ten minute breaks.

The results indicated that dogs responded better to the gestures than the cats. In laboratory conditions, all of the dogs made a choice for at least half of the trials while only 15 out of 33 cats did the same.

The researchers discovered that the dogs were much more skilled at finding the treats, discovering the treats significantly more often than the cats did.

Dogs also remained motivated throughout the entire test, in contrast to the cats, which became less willing to choose.

In case the cats were at a disadvantage in an unfamiliar environment, a sub-group of cats were later tested at home. The cats’ willingness to choose a container did not decline in home conditions, and their overall success remained lower than dogs.

Márta Gácsi, lead researcher of the study, said: "There may be several sources of these differences. Cats may have been less attentive, less motivated by food rewards, or frustrated by the unfamiliar environment or unusual handling during the test,”

She added: “All things considered, it's no surprise that it's less relevant for cats to rely on human communication cues"

The full study can be found in the journal Scientific Reports.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Equine Disease Surveillance report released for Q4 2025

News Story 1
 The latest Equine Disease Surveillance report has been released, with details on equine disease from Q4 of 2025.

The report, produced by Equine Infectious Disease Surveillance, includes advice on rule changes for equine influenza vaccination.

Statistics and maps detail recent outbreaks of equine herpes virus, equine influenza, equine strangles and equine grass sickness. A series of laboratory reports provides data on virology, bacteriology, parasitology and toxicosis.

This issue also features a case study of orthoflavivus-associated neurological disease in a horse in the UK. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
RCVS annual renewal fee for vets due

RCVS' annual renewal fee for veterinary surgeons is now due. Vets must pay their renewal fee before Wednesday, 1 April 2026.

This year's standard annual fee has increased to 431 from last year's 418. This is an approximately three per cent increase, as approved by RCVS Council and the Privy Council.

Tshidi Gardner, RCVS treasurer, said: "The small fee increase will be used to help deliver both our everyday activities and our new ambitious Strategic Plan, which includes aims such as achieving new legislation, reviewing the Codes of Professional Conduct and supporting guidance, and continuing to support the professions through activities such as the Mind Matters Initiative, RCVS Academy and career development."

A full breakdown of the new fees is on the RCVS website. Information about tax relief is available on the UK government website.