Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Dogs understand pointing better than cats, study finds
Dogs remained motivated throughout the test, while cats became less willing to choose.
Cats were also less likely to make choices.

The findings of a study have suggested that dogs may be better at understanding hand gestures, such as pointing, than cats are.

New research conducted by Eötvös Loránd University, compared how well dogs and cats responded to human pointing gestures when completing an object choice task.

The study involved domestic cats and dogs being offered a choice of two boxes, one of which contained a food reward. An experimenter then pointed to the container with the food, before the animals chose a container.

A total of 21 small-sized dogs and 32 companion cats took part in the study, with more feline subjects being assessed in anticipation of them dropping out of the study. Forty-three cats arrived for the pointing test initially, however nine were excluded for various reasons – including refusing to leave their box, failing a motivation test and biting their owner.

Both the cats and the dogs were allowed a habituation process to familiarise themselves with the laboratory conditions and the experimenter.

The animal was then held by its owner, only being released once the experimenter had gestured towards the correct container. They were then assessed on whether they made a correct, incorrect or no choice.

The trial was conducted 28 times, with optional ten minute breaks.

The results indicated that dogs responded better to the gestures than the cats. In laboratory conditions, all of the dogs made a choice for at least half of the trials while only 15 out of 33 cats did the same.

The researchers discovered that the dogs were much more skilled at finding the treats, discovering the treats significantly more often than the cats did.

Dogs also remained motivated throughout the entire test, in contrast to the cats, which became less willing to choose.

In case the cats were at a disadvantage in an unfamiliar environment, a sub-group of cats were later tested at home. The cats’ willingness to choose a container did not decline in home conditions, and their overall success remained lower than dogs.

Márta Gácsi, lead researcher of the study, said: "There may be several sources of these differences. Cats may have been less attentive, less motivated by food rewards, or frustrated by the unfamiliar environment or unusual handling during the test,”

She added: “All things considered, it's no surprise that it's less relevant for cats to rely on human communication cues"

The full study can be found in the journal Scientific Reports.

Image © Shutterstock

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
RCVS pays tribute to well-loved equine vet

The RCVS and the Riding Establishments Subcommittee has paid tribute to well-loved veterinary surgeon and riding establishment inspector, Rebecca Hamilton-Fletcher MRCVS.

Linda Belton MRCVS, RCVS President, said: "I, along with my colleagues on the RESC, RCVS Council, RCVS Standards Committee, as well as RCVS staff, was very saddened to hear of the sudden death of Rebecca, or Becca as we knew her, last week.

"She was a true advocate for equine welfare and in her many years on the RESC worked to continually improve the quality and consistency of riding establishment inspections, all in the interests of enhanced horse welfare and rider safety."