Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

MPs call for clarity on XL bully definition
XL bully dogs will be banned from 1 February 2024.

Committee warns that current guidance could confuse public.

MPs on the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (EFRA) Committee have called on the Government to offer more clarity to pet owners on the definition of the XL bully breed.

In a letter to Lord Benyon, minister for climate, environment and energy, the cross-party committee outlined its general support for the upcoming ban on the breed, but raised a number of issues that need to be addressed.

The MPs warned that current guidance risks owners misidentifying their dogs as XL bullies.

Under the guidance, a dog is considered an XL bully if it meets the minimum height measurements and ‘a substantial number of the characteristics in the official definition’.

In their letter, the committee point out a lack of guidance on what ‘substantial’ means in this context, which could cause confusion for members of the public and lead to dogs being registered as XL bullies which do not fit the criteria.

More than 4,000 owners have already applied to register their dog.

The MPs also called for an extension of the deadline for neutering dogs that are under seven months old on 31 January 2024, as scientific evidence suggests that neutering too young can cause health problems in large breeds. The same request has previously been made by the British Veterinary Association.

Concerns were also raised in the letter about whether there are enough experts to identify XL bullies and whether dog wardens, shelters and other relevant organisations have enough capacity and funding to cope with a potential rise in abandonments.

The impact on the mental health of those working in the veterinary and related sectors was also raised. According to the letter: ‘Early data suggest that a significant proportion of vets could refuse to euthanise a healthy animal, as they are entitled to do under their code of conduct.’

Dr Neil Hudson MP, member of the EFRA Committee and veterinary surgeon, said: “Our EFRA Committee supports the upcoming ban on XL bully dogs for public and other animal safety, but we are making recommendations to Government to help with the practical and compassionate implementation of the ban.”

Image © Shutterstock

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Practices urged to audit neutering data

News Story 1
 RCVS Knowledge has called on vet practices to audit their post-operative neutering outcomes.

It follows the release of the 2024 NASAN benchmarking report, which collates data from neutering procedures performed on dogs, cats and rabbits.

The benchmarking report enables practices in the UK and Ireland to compare their post-operative outcomes to the national average. This includes the rate of patients lost to follow-up, which in 2024 increased to 23 per cent.

Anyone from the practice can submit the data using a free template. The deadline for next report is February 2026.

Visit the RCVS Knowledge website to complete an audit. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
RCVS pays tribute to well-loved equine vet

The RCVS and the Riding Establishments Subcommittee has paid tribute to well-loved veterinary surgeon and riding establishment inspector, Rebecca Hamilton-Fletcher MRCVS.

Linda Belton MRCVS, RCVS President, said: "I, along with my colleagues on the RESC, RCVS Council, RCVS Standards Committee, as well as RCVS staff, was very saddened to hear of the sudden death of Rebecca, or Becca as we knew her, last week.

"She was a true advocate for equine welfare and in her many years on the RESC worked to continually improve the quality and consistency of riding establishment inspections, all in the interests of enhanced horse welfare and rider safety."