Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Vets join push for ‘total overhaul’ of Dangerous Dogs Act
Pit bull terriers are among the four breeds banned in the UK under the Dangerous Dogs Act.
BVA leads call for change on the legislation’s 30th anniversary.

Veterinary and animal welfare organisations have joined forces to prevent certain dog breeds from being put down based on their appearance.

The BVA has teamed up with Dogs Trust, Battersea, The Kennel Club and the RSPCA to push for changes to Section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act, which applies breed-specific legislation (BSL) banning the ownership of four different dog breeds.

BVA senior vice president Daniella Dos Santos said: “The veterinary profession has long campaigned for a total overhaul of the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act because it targets specific breeds rather than deeds and gives a false impression that dogs not on the banned list are ‘safe’.

“All the latest evidence supports our view that breed-specific legislation has been ineffective in its intended aims, thereby failing to either properly protect the public or safeguard dog welfare over the last three decades.”

The move comes on the 30th Anniversary of the Dangerous Dogs Act, introduced to protect the public after a series of tragic incidents involving dogs. However, campaigners argue that the legislation was never well-considered or based on scientific evidence. 

In 2016, the RSPCA launched the #EndBSL campaign which led to a parliamentary inquiry into the legislation. Findings later published by the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee stated that a change in the law would be achievable and better protect the public, but the legislation remains unchanged. 

According to Battersea, the Dangerous Dogs Act has done little to protect the public from dog attacks, with hospital admissions for dog bites rising by 154 per cent between 1999 and 2019.

Battersea chief executive, Peter Laurie, said: “Every year many friendly dogs are unfairly condemned simply for the way that they look. Ultimately it is rescue organisations like Battersea who care for these dogs and that have to deal with this flawed and unfair legislation. We urge the Government to review the law properly; and work with welfare groups and dog owners to craft new legislation that puts the focus on a dog’s actions rather than its appearance.” 

Daniella Dos Santos added: "As the Dangerous Dogs Act completes 30 years, we continue to call on the Government to enact robust, fit-for-purpose legislation that effectively tackles individual acts of aggression and irresponsible ownership, rather than banning entire breeds.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.