Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Study offers alternatives to wildlife trade ban
The researchers believe that the Critical Control Points approach could be expanded to the wildlife trade.

The study argues for an alternative solution in food safety systems.

Researchers at the RVC, Griffith University, and a wildlife trade NGO – TRAFFIC, have untaken a recent study, which suggests that existing systems for food safety, rather than broad bans on the wildlife trade, are crucial to preventing future pandemics.

The study was led by Dr Duan Biggs from the Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security at Griffith University, along with Professor Richard Kock, professor of Wildlife Health and Emerging Diseases at the RVC, and James Compton, who is the project leader at TRAFFIC.

Published in Lancet Planetary Health, the research suggests that a solution to the disease risk in the wildlife trade is through prioritising extending existing food health safety systems over bans on the trade.

The study argues for the impracticality of blanket bans on the wildlife trade, with the unsustainable nature of a ban, combined with the consequences on those whose livelihoods are dependent on the trade.

Dr Duan Briggs said: “The wildlife trade is suspected to have played a role in the appearance and spread of new potentially dangerous diseases including COVID-19. In response, many organisations have called for a global ban of the trade and consumption of wild animals by humans.”

“Bans in wildlife trade in response to previous disease outbreaks like Ebola have been short-lived and unsustainable, and in many ways increase disease risk as trade is forced underground. Targeted Bans have their place and value, but alternatives also need to be sought.”

Professor Richard Kock added: “Identifying source pathogens for new human diseases is like finding a “needle in a haystack” and we need innovative preventive practices so we don’t need to find them. We have a pretty good system in place for reducing risks of disease from animal based food from domestic species, but wildlife-based food and products is inadequately managed, so incorporating current models into this trade is just common sense.”

Image (C) Gregory Moine

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

HMRC seeks feedback on locum employment categorisation

News Story 1
 HMRC has invited feedback to its communications regarding the employment status of locum vets and vet nurses.

A letter, sent from HMRC last year, provided guidance for practices categorising the employment status of locum veterinary surgeons and veterinary nurses.

It is now inviting anonymous feedback from those making employment status decisions on their communications. The survey takes 5-10 minutes to complete and closes on Friday, 6 February.

The survey can be accessed here

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Survey seeks ruminant sector views on antimicrobial stewardship

A new survey is seeking views of people working in the UK ruminant sector on how to tackle the challenge of demonstrating responsible antibiotic stewardship.

Forming part of a wider, collaborative initiative, the results will help identify the types of data available so that challenges with data collection can be better understood and addressed.

Anyone working in the UK farming sector, including vets and farmers,is encouraged to complete the survey, which is available at app.onlinesurveys.jisc.ac.uk