Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Traditional frequent worming of horses 'unnecessary' – study
"No adverse health affects were seen that could be ascribed to scaling down de-wroming intensity" - Dr Martin Nielsen.

Researchers assess the effect of different parasite control protocols.

Reducing worming intensity does not have any adverse health risks to horses, according to new research.

Writing in the Equine Veterinary Journal, researchers describe their study in which they examined the worm egg count levels, bodyweight and equine health of groups of mares and foals under different parasite control protocols.

The protocols included traditional frequent de-worming and drug rotation, and the currently recommended protocols of less de-worming and more egg counts.

Their study determined that the traditional approach of frequent routine de-worming at pre-determined intervals, without the use of diagnostic testing, is unnecessary.

Study leader Dr Martin Nielsen said that a persistent growing resistance to anthelmintics is challenging researchers to find more sustainable parasite control programmes.

“De-worming every six to eight weeks and rotating between products is still very common around the world, but this sort of carpet bombing is completely unnecessary and drug rotation does not prevent drug resistance," he said.

“Many people are not comfortable with de-worming less frequently, thinking it will compromise horse health, but our study shows that this is not the case; no adverse health effects were seen that could be ascribed to scaling down de-worming intensity.”

BEVA chair of health and medicines David Rendle added: "This study provides further evidence to show that there is no justification for the traditional approach of calendar-based routine treatment and gives further reassurance that the frequency of treatment can be reduced without detriment to equine health or development of youngstock.

"Spreading this information will hopefully encourage any horse owners who have not done so already to change from their old-fashioned habits of frequent de-worming, to a diagnostic test-led, or at least a more strategic approach with routine drug-resistance testing"

Two short videos,one for vets and one for horse owners, have been produced to help explain the findings and for veterianry practices to share with their clients on social media.

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.