Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Inspectors to introduce tougher inspection regime for tail docking
Routine tail docking is not permitted by law.
Producers must prove that docking has been used as a last resort

A tougher inspection regime for tail docking and enrichment in pigs is set to be introduced after several producers were found to have fallen foul of APHA’s enhanced enforcement activity.

According to the National Pig Association (NPA), Defra and the APHA will be clamping down on tail docking ‘in a big way’. The move is reported to have originated from the European Commission, which is putting pressure on all member states to enforce tail docking and enrichment legislation.

In an article for Pig World, NPA said that each member state was required to submit an action plan at the start of 2018. In the UK plan, Defra and the APHA made several commitments, including the increased inspection of pig farms.

The plan also included new guidance and training of APHA assessors and better recording of tail biting and docking in abattoirs by the Food Standards Agency.

Commenting on the inspections, a Defra spokesperson said: “Routine tail docking is not permitted by law. Pig farmers need to demonstrate at inspections that tail docking has been used as a last resort after taking the necessary steps, as described in the current welfare code, to reduce the risks of tail biting.

“This includes actions to improve the pigs’ environment and their management. We want full compliance.”

Producers that have already fallen foul of APHA’s enhanced enforcement activity have received deductions to their Basic Payment and/or served enforcement notices. NPA chief executive Zoe Davis said the penalties were being imposed where tails were being routinely docked and farmers had not taken steps to prevent tail biting - such as improving the pigs’ environment.

“We are keen to ensure that producers are not unfairly penalised. We are seeking more clarity in a number of areas and are feeding into the discussion on the new Welfare Code to ensure it provides this,” she said.

“We are also trying to get across the complexity of dealing with tailing biting outbreaks. It is a multifactorial problem and can be unpredictable. Pig producers in all systems experience tail biting to varying degrees and once an outbreak has started it can be very difficult to stop.

“Experience has shown that in some situations, there will be a need to dock tails to prevent a worse situation. At the same time, we are trying to avoid situations where farmers feel compelled to stop tail docking without veterinary supervision or taking steps to avoid tail biting – and end up creating worse problems.”

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Two new roles on BEVA Nurse Committee

News Story 1
 The BEVA has opened two new roles on its Nurse Committee.

There is one role available for a full member (for three years) and one role for a student member (until they qualify).

Members must attend all meetings, occurring four times a year. They will assist the committee in understanding the field, identifying issues and engaging with external parties.

More details can be found here

Click here for more...
News Shorts
BSAVA publishes Guide to Nutrition in Small Animal Practice

The BSAVA has added a small animal nutrition advice booklet to its series of BSAVA guides.

The BSAVA Guide to Nutrition in Small Animal Practice offers a resource for veterinary professionals to provide appropriate nutrition for animals. As well as maintaining the wellbeing of healthy pets, the guide explores how nutritional requirements change in times of illness and disease.

The guide is divided into five sections, which explore the importance of nutritional assessment; diet types; feeding at different life stages; feeding for specific situations; and feeding for specific diseases. Online resources are also in the BSAVA Library including client handouts and videos.

It is designed to be suitable for referencing, in-depth case planning and team training sessions.

The BSAVA Guide to Nutrition in Small Animal Practice can be purchased online from the BSAVA store.