Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Concerns over social media data use in research
“Researchers may be using information that has been willingly shared in the public domain but this doesn’t give them carte blanche to do as they please."
Guidelines ‘failing to keep pace with technology’

Information shared on social media is being regularly used in research without the users’ consent, according to a new study that calls for better UK guidance.

Social media data is increasingly being used to gain an insight into human behaviours, feelings and opinions. However, researchers from the University of Edinburgh say ethics frameworks for these studies are not keeping pace with technological advances.

The team analysed 156 published health studies involving social media data. They found less than a third reported ethical consideration on the use of personal information. And only two of the nine studies by UK institutions referred to the Research Councils UK (RCUK) recommended guidelines.

Only four out of 13 sets of ethics guidelines developed or endorsed by the RCUK, mention the use of social media data in research.

“Our study highlights a significant gap in UK guidance on mining social media data for research purposes,” said Dr Claudia Pagliari, of the University of Edinburgh’s Usher Institute.
 
“Ethics is about more than privacy in this context,” she continued. “Researchers may be using information that has been willingly shared in the public domain but this doesn’t give them carte blanche to do as they please. Asking permission to use people’s social media postings is courteous, although this may be impossible in very large studies. Treating personal information with confidentiality and respect, and avoiding its misuse for unethical purposes, are essential.”
 
Dr Pagliari believes funding bodies, learned societies, research organisations and journals also have a part to play in ensuring high ethical standards in such studies. Good interdisciplinary guidelines and clear expectations of how they should be applied, will help to improve practices, she added.

The findings are published in the journal Research Ethics.

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

FIVP launches CMA remedies survey

News Story 1
 FIVP has shared a survey, inviting those working in independent practice to share their views on the CMA's proposed remedies.

The Impact Assessment will help inform the group's response to the CMA, as it prepares to submit further evidence to the Inquiry Group. FIVP will also be attending a hearing in November.

Data will be anonymised and used solely for FIVP's response to the CMA. The survey will close on Friday, 31 October 2025. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
CMA to host webinar exploring provisional decisions

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is to host a webinar for veterinary professionals to explain the details of its provisional decisions, released on 15 October 2025.

The webinar will take place on Wednesday, 29 October 2025 from 1.00pm to 2.00pm.

Officials will discuss the changes which those in practice may need to make if the provisional remedies go ahead. They will also share what happens next with the investigation.

The CMA will be answering questions from the main parties of the investigation, as well as other questions submitted ahead of the webinar.

Attendees can register here before Wednesday, 29 October at 11am. Questions must be submitted before 10am on 27 October.

A recording of the webinar will be accessible after the event.