Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Fresh calls for tougher animal cruelty sentencing
scan of dog showing nail through head
Walkers discovered the dog still alive with a nail sticking out from between his eyes.

Four-month jail sentence handed down in shocking cruelty case
 
Two men who hammered a nail into a dog’s head and buried it alive have been sentenced to just four months in prison, the RSPCA has revealed, prompting fresh calls for tougher sentences for animal cruelty offences.

Walkers in North Yorkshire discovered the dog last October when they heard whimpering coming from a mound of earth. Finding the dog still alive, with a nail sticking out from between his eyes, they called the police and rushed him to a nearby veterinary practice, where he had to be euthanised to end his suffering.

The vet described it as the worst case of animal cruelty ever seen.

Richard Finch, 60, and Michael Heathcock, 59, from Redcar, were sentenced at Teesside Magistrates’ Court yesterday (1 March), the RSPCA reported. Sentencing them to four months in jail, the chair of the bench described the acts as “barbaric and premeditated”, according to the charity.

The maximum sentence for offences under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 is currently six months in jail and an unlimited fine, but in this case the RSPCA said magistrates had to take into account the defendants’ early guilty pleas.

David Bowles, head of external affairs at the charity, said the magistrate gave the longest sentence they could, but “it’s possible they will only end up serving eight weeks”.

The RSPCA is renewing its calls for tougher sentencing for animal welfare offences. Mr Bowles added: “Scamp’s ordeal was horrific and heartbreaking and the sentence handed out to his killers will upset and anger animal lovers. This terrible case is the perfect illustration as to why we need to give magistrates and judges powers to give tougher sentences for the most appalling cases of cruelty and neglect.”

Last month the government announced it would not be extending the maximum jail sentences for animal welfare offences, after a report by the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee called for the penalty to be increased to five years in prison. Responding, the government said current sentencing practice ‘does not suggest that the courts are finding current sentencing powers inadequate’. But it added that the Sentencing Council had revised the magistrates’ court sentencing guidelines.

Image courtesy of the RSPCA

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.