Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Mixed views on 'Milk For Farmers'
milk
Nearly 60 per cent of consumers thought they shouldn't have to pay more for products, as farmers should already be getting a fair price.
Poll reveals shoppers' views on premium products
 
More than 70 per cent of consumers who took part in a recent poll said they would pay more for a product if they knew the extra money would go to the farmer.

However, the survey also revealed nearly 60 per cent of people thought they shouldn't have to pay more, as farmers should already be getting a fair price. Just over 40 per cent, on the other hand, said consumers had a responsibility to support British farmers.

The poll was carried out by the sustainability consultancy Footprint, following the news that Morrisons would launch a new premium-cost milk brand to support farmers.

Set to appear on supermarket shelves this autumn, 'Milk For Farmers' will cost 10p per litre more than Morrisons' other own-brand milk - with the extra money going direct to farmers. The move was announced following recent protests about low milk prices.

The poll asks the question: 'Should customers be expected to pay extra to support farmers rather than suppliers or retailers offering the farmer a better deal?'

According to the results, 42.9 per cent of consumers to take part thought a new brand giving more to farmers is a must. Yet 42.9 per cent said farmers should be paid a fair price to begin with, whereas 14.3 per cent were concerned higher prices would put people off buying British.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Annual submission deadline small pet animal exemptions

News Story 1
 Companies marketing medicines for small pets exempt from authorisation must submit their annual return to the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) by 30 November 2026.

Submitting this annual return ensures continued compliance with regulatory requirements for products marketed without a full Marketing Authorisation. The exemption specifically applies to products intended for animals, cage birds, terrarium animals, small rodents, ferrets and rabbits.

For further details and submission guidelines, visit the gov.uk website.  

Click here for more...
News Shorts
BVA urges 'continued vigilance' over bluetongue

The British Veterinary Association (BVA) has urged vigilance following a concerning rise in Bluetongue (BTV) cases in sheep and cattle.

In a recent statement, the BVA noted that members are reporting more severe clinical signs and higher mortality rates than in previous years.

'We know that farm vets are working hard to support farmers and animals affected by this outbreak, during what is an extremely difficult time for all involved,' they stated. 'Continued vigilance to identify disease early is vital and vaccination remains the best way of protecting animals from this disease.'