Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Anti-cruelty petition reaches 100k signatures
beagle
"We need tougher penalties for these crimes. People cannot play God and take the lives of our animals, it's not right, it's not humane and these crimes need stopping."

Campaigners call for tougher penalties for animal cruelty

An e-petition calling for tougher prison sentences for those who kill, bait or are cruel to animals has reached 100,000 signatures.

Closing on 30 March, the petition will be considered for debate by the Backbench Business Committee.

Elaine McCallion, who launched the petition, wants the government to "end the unnecessary suffering of our animals" by introducing greater penalties, including a lifetime ban on keeping animals, for those who engage in acts of cruelty to animals.

"I want to start a petition to raise awareness of all animals in the UK that are subjected to horrific deaths, baiting and acts of cruelty and neglect..." the petition states.

"We need tougher penalties for these crimes. People cannot play God and take the lives of our animals, it's not right, it's not humane and these crimes need stopping.

"Animals get such bad press and if they attack one time too many are put to sleep. So why should humans be allowed to get away with murdering, baiting and being cruel to our animals."

When the petition reached 10,000 signatures, the government published the following response: "The Government abhors animal cruelty. Powers for local authorities and police to investigate and take action in cases of suspected cruelty are provided in the Animal Welfare Act 2006.

"Under the 2006 Act, the maximum penalty for causing unnecessary suffering is a fine of £20,000 or six months imprisonment, or both. In addition, the court can impose post-conviction penalties on anyone found guilty of causing unnecessary suffering to an animal by disqualifying anyone from having any influence over the keeping of animals for as long as the court see fit."

To sign the petition, visit:

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/63445P

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.