Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Dogs aid paralysis study
dog and human
Nineteen paraplegic dogs were recruited for the study.
Findings could lead to personalised treatments for spinal cord injuries

Research by North Carolina State University involving paraplegic dogs has revealed that a one-size fits all approach is not ideal for treating spinal cord injuries and courses of treatment should instead be diverse.

The findings could lead to personalised treatments for spinal cord injuries, and hopefully better outcomes for canine and potentially human patients.

Led by Natasha Olby, professor of neurology at NC State University, the research team conducted a clinical trial involving the drug 4-AP and a derivative of the drug called t-butly.

4-AP has been tested on humans for spinal cord injury, and is currently used as a treatment for multiple sclerosis. T-butyl has not been tested clinically on humans. Both drugs work by helping damaged nerves transmit signals.

Nineteen paraplegic dogs were recruited for the study.  All of the dogs had suffered similar spinal cord injuries, and had been injured long enough to rule out any hope of unaided recovery.  A placebo and both drugs were administered to the dogs, each for a two-week block of randomly assigned time, first to determine whether the drugs were effective, and then to see whether or not there was a difference in efficacy between the two medications.

Professor Olby said: "The question quickly went from 'Do the drugs work?' to 'Why aren't they having similar effects across the board?'. And there are many possible factors to consider – some of the dogs may not have any axons left for the drug to act on, or it may depend upon how long they’ve been paralyzed or even whether or not they have a genetic predisposition to respond to this treatment.”

Professor Olby is now focussed on determining how best to identify patient populations that will respond best to the treatment.

She adds: “There is no doubt that either or both of these medications can have an amazing effect on the right patient – but now we have to do the work of finding out what conditions make a patient the right one. If we can do that, we may save both patients and owners a lot of unnecessary frustration.”

The study, “Potassium channel antagonists 4-aminopyridine and the t-butyl carbamate derivative of 4-aminopyridine improve hind limb function in chronically non-ambulatory dogs; a blinded, placebo-controlled trial,” is published in PLOS One.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Voting opens for BEVA Council

News Story 1
 Eligible members of BEVA will be able to vote for their Council team until Monday, 17 August 2026. Members will have received an election email on 17 July.

There are five candidates standing for four available places on Council. They are:

  • Alexandre Triguino
  • Angela Jones
  • Beth Bryant
  • Holly Rees
  • Hugh Somerville
Full profiles for each candidate can be found on the BEVA website

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Milk recalled over presence of veterinary medicines

Graham's Family Dairy has issued a recall for its semi-skimmed milk due to the presence of veterinary medicines in the product.

In a risk statement, the Food Standards Agency said the presence of the medicines, including penicillin, make the milk unsafe to consume and 'may be a possible health risk for anyone with an allergy to antibiotics'.

Customers who bought the product are advised to return it to the store of purchase for a full refund.