Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Are dangerous dogs the victims?
Kendal Shephard
Kendal Shephard
More data needed on the factors surrounding dog bites, says vet

"If we don't consider a dog's emotions, motivations and behaviour…we can legislate until we're blue in the face but we will not prevent dog bites," said veterinary behaviourist Kendal Shepherd.

Speaking at the BVA Congress today (November 21), she said more must be done to examine and record the factors surrounding dog bites.

"We need to treat the dog bite itself as the pathogen…the dog is just the transmitter of the pathogen," she argued.

Currently, she said, investigations are carried out in order to lay blame, with a reliance on crime and punishment, but dog bite incidents should be considered an extreme public health concern, not a crime. She called for a move away from the emphasis on punishing the owner, to refocus on investigating incidents in a thorough and non-judgemental way.

In these investigations, the behaviour of both the dog and the victim must also be taken into consideration as "they are part of the context that made the bite happen and we cannot avoid that".

Under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, a dog can be considered dangerous if it causes fear of injury, even if it does not bite anyone. She raised the concern that a person's response to incidents is key - as the same behaviour may be very frightening for one person, and not at all for another.

Police sergeant Peter Madden explained what it's like to enforce dangerous dog laws. He said: "We are not looking to criminalise owners…where there is an issue, we deal with that issue". This often involves a control order - commonly mandating that the dog be kept muzzled and on a lead in public, or simply that the dog be put in another room when the postman knocks at the door.

Dogs seized by the police come from a variety of places, including very good homes and often incidents are a one off.

Part of the source of dog aggression may be a persistence of the "dominance myth". Far too often, Ms Shepherd said she sees owners and even trainers and vets who say a dog is displaying dominant behaviour, yet more often than not, aggression is an expression of fear and anxiety, not dominance. Ms Shepherd warns that dominance training will result in aggression.

Cultural factors were also highlighted as being part of a shift in attitudes towards dogs. Often Asian children are raised to fear dogs, Ms Shepherd said, an issue she feels "we tend to pussy foot around due to political correctness".

"Education must cut across the cultural issue," she said. " It's shifted the evolutionary goalposts too far for dogs to keep up…we have to address this issue. The dog is adapted to go and say hello to people, it is not adapted to have people scream and run away from it".

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

FIVP launches CMA remedies survey

News Story 1
 FIVP has shared a survey, inviting those working in independent practice to share their views on the CMA's proposed remedies.

The Impact Assessment will help inform the group's response to the CMA, as it prepares to submit further evidence to the Inquiry Group. FIVP will also be attending a hearing in November.

Data will be anonymised and used solely for FIVP's response to the CMA. The survey will close on Friday, 31 October 2025. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
CMA to host webinar exploring provisional decisions

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is to host a webinar for veterinary professionals to explain the details of its provisional decisions, released on 15 October 2025.

The webinar will take place on Wednesday, 29 October 2025 from 1.00pm to 2.00pm.

Officials will discuss the changes which those in practice may need to make if the provisional remedies go ahead. They will also share what happens next with the investigation.

The CMA will be answering questions from the main parties of the investigation, as well as other questions submitted ahead of the webinar.

Attendees can register here before Wednesday, 29 October at 11am. Questions must be submitted before 10am on 27 October.

A recording of the webinar will be accessible after the event.