Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

RCVS’ decision to remove vet from Register overturned

Vet's appeal to Privy Council proved successful

Leeds-based veterinary surgeon Dr Gary Samuel has successfully overturned a decision made by the Disciplinary Committee of Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons to remove him from the Register.

Dr Samuel was convicted of theft, common assault and a public order offence at Cardiff Magistrates’ Court in November 2011 following an altercation with a neighbour.

Cardiff Magistrates’ Court sentenced Dr Samuel to concurrent terms of 28 days imprisonment for theft and common assault and 12 weeks imprisonment for the public order offence, all suspended for 12 months. He had also been ordered to carry out 140 hours unpaid work and to pay compensation of £75 and costs of £625.

The Disciplinary Committee agreed that this made him unfit to practise veterinary surgery. However, Dr Samuel believed that the Disciplinary Committee’s sanction of removal from the Register was “disproportionately severe” and launched an appeal.

The Privy Council felt that, in making its decision, the Disciplinary Committee followed too closely the verdict reached by the Magistrates’ Court, and did not take mitigating circumstances sufficiently into account, including whether the attack by Dr Samuel on his neighbour had been provoked by racial abuse.

Delivering the Privy Council’s judgment, Lord Toulson said: “It is apparent from the reasons given by the Committee, both on the question of fitness to practise and on the question of sanction, that it was considerably influenced by the fact that the magistrates imposed a suspended prison sentence.

“Although Dr Samuel pleaded guilty to the theft of the camera and he was not in entitled to go behind his plea, it is nevertheless difficult to understand on the evidence how the prosecution would have proved that there was an intent permanently to deprive [the victim] of it.”

 

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

FIVP launches CMA remedies survey

News Story 1
 FIVP has shared a survey, inviting those working in independent practice to share their views on the CMA's proposed remedies.

The Impact Assessment will help inform the group's response to the CMA, as it prepares to submit further evidence to the Inquiry Group. FIVP will also be attending a hearing in November.

Data will be anonymised and used solely for FIVP's response to the CMA. The survey will close on Friday, 31 October 2025. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
CMA to host webinar exploring provisional decisions

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is to host a webinar for veterinary professionals to explain the details of its provisional decisions, released on 15 October 2025.

The webinar will take place on Wednesday, 29 October 2025 from 1.00pm to 2.00pm.

Officials will discuss the changes which those in practice may need to make if the provisional remedies go ahead. They will also share what happens next with the investigation.

The CMA will be answering questions from the main parties of the investigation, as well as other questions submitted ahead of the webinar.

Attendees can register here before Wednesday, 29 October at 11am. Questions must be submitted before 10am on 27 October.

A recording of the webinar will be accessible after the event.