Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel

Tail docking ban could be lifted in Scotland
The University of Glasgow study found more than half of working spaniels had suffered tail injuries in the past year. It recommended docking puppy tails to reduce injury risk.
The University of Glasgow study found more than half of working spaniels had suffered tail injuries in the past year. It recommended docking puppy tails to reduce injury risk.

Dogs Trust raises concerns over research validity

Tail docking could soon be allowed on certain dog breeds in Scotland after a study found that it could reduce the risk of injury.

In a move that has been criticised by the Dogs Trust, the Scottish Government has said it is considering lifting an existing ban to allow docking for working breeds.

It follows the publication of research by the University of Glasgow, commissioned by the Scottish Government, which found more than half of working undocked spaniels, had experienced a tail injury within the past year.

Of a total of 2860 working dogs included in the survey of 1,000 owners, 13.5 per cent had received tail injuries in the 2010/11 shooting season. Undocked spaniels were at the greatest risk with 56.6 per cent injured, while hunt point retrievers were not far behind with 38.5 per cent sustaining tail injuries.

Researchers suggested that docking at a young age could reduce the risk of injury.

Rural Affairs Secretary Richard Lochhead said: “It is clear to me that animal welfare is an extremely important issue and one which is close to many people’s hearts.

"For that reason, any decision taken by the Scottish Government fully considers the welfare of each and every animal affected. In some cases, as in this one, there is no clear, straightforward answer and a balance needs to be struck.

“This research that we have funded has provided a sound basis for us to discuss with concerned parties where that balance point should be between protecting the welfare of puppies and protecting the welfare of adult working dogs, and whether further action is justified to protect working dogs from injury.

“I must stress that I have as yet taken no firm stance on this; we need to gain a clearer understanding of the views of interested parties in Scotland before any decision is made.

“I have therefore invited key interested parties to consider the findings of this research and to comment on whether they merit further consideration of a possible exemption to the ban on tail docking for specific working dogs.”

Key organisations have been asked to feedback on the findings by May 23, 2014.

The Scottish Gamekeepers’ Association backs the ban being lifted.

But the Dogs Trust questioned whether the reduction of a injury risk justified the pain involved with tail docking.

It said the university's research team had advertised the surrey to more than 17,500 owners of working dogs, but received just 1,005 replies. This, the Dogs Trust said, may mean the risk of injury has been overestimated while those that did respond gave anecdotal accounts rather than details of verifiable injuries.

The survey had suggested that anywhere between 18 and 108 working puppies would need to be docked to prevent a single veterinary treatment taking place.

But a second piece of research by the university, which consulted with just eight veterinary practices in Scotland,  suggested 232 working breed puppies would need to be docked to prevent a single veterinary treatment.

"Based on these points and others, Dogs Trust has grave reservations regarding the validity of the research, which we do not believe is representative or forms a sufficient evidence - base on which any possible changes to legislation should be formed," said a spokesman.

 

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

FIVP launches CMA remedies survey

News Story 1
 FIVP has shared a survey, inviting those working in independent practice to share their views on the CMA's proposed remedies.

The Impact Assessment will help inform the group's response to the CMA, as it prepares to submit further evidence to the Inquiry Group. FIVP will also be attending a hearing in November.

Data will be anonymised and used solely for FIVP's response to the CMA. The survey will close on Friday, 31 October 2025. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
CMA to host webinar exploring provisional decisions

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is to host a webinar for veterinary professionals to explain the details of its provisional decisions, released on 15 October 2025.

The webinar will take place on Wednesday, 29 October 2025 from 1.00pm to 2.00pm.

Officials will discuss the changes which those in practice may need to make if the provisional remedies go ahead. They will also share what happens next with the investigation.

The CMA will be answering questions from the main parties of the investigation, as well as other questions submitted ahead of the webinar.

Attendees can register here before Wednesday, 29 October at 11am. Questions must be submitted before 10am on 27 October.

A recording of the webinar will be accessible after the event.