Your data on MRCVSonline
The nature of the services provided by Vision Media means that we might obtain certain information about you.
Please read our Data Protection and Privacy Policy for details.

In addition, (with your consent) some parts of our website may store a 'cookie' in your browser for the purposes of
functionality or performance monitoring.
Click here to manage your settings.
If you would like to forward this story on to a friend, simply fill in the form below and click send.

Your friend's email:
Your email:
Your name:
 
 
Send Cancel
AWF debates animal welfare
Annual Discussion Forum on the use of animals

This year's Animal Welfare Foundation forum quickly became fully booked and after listening to the quality discussions on offer, it was clear to see why so many people were eager to participate in it.

The programme began with three very interesting talks - all of which came under the heading of 'Using and abusing: animals for human benefit'. David Martin (BVA Ethics and Welfare Group) based his discussion on livestock shows and a secret underworld of manipulation that breeders carry out on their livestock in a bid to win. There were some shocking revelations, especially involving super glue and steroids.

Andrew Coe (College of Animal Welfare) talked about hobby farming and the pros and cons of small holdings. Often comparing the quality of life for animals on a hobby farm to those within a commercial venture, Andrew Coe reflected that you will always get good and bad pet owners and hobby farmers and that education is the best way to increase the number of responsible owners.

Ben Mayes (BEVA President) looked at horses as performance animals and provided many statistics regarding horse racing and the risks (or lack of) that race horses are facing. It was an interesting discussion and one that many of the audience engaged with.

The next session was grouped as 'The green green grass of home, do cows belong in fields? Behavioural and clinical evidence'. John Fishwick (RVC) gave an explanation of practises used within large and small scale systems of cattle farming and talked of his experiences of 'mega dairies' in Saudi Arabia. Becky Whay (University of Bristol) continued the discussion and looked at the behavioural needs of cows and cited some interesting research carried out.

There was then a brief update on the current AWF projects and this included a new study into contagious ovine digital dermatitis.

The closing discussion was the most contentious of the day and was entitled 'Is pro bono too close to the edge: Public expectations of vets vs vets' responsibilities and views of their role'. Comprising of three situations that vets may commonly experience, Robin Hargreaves (Chairman, BVA Member Services Group) and Alison Lambert (Onswitch) acted out the scenarios and gave the audience the chance to vote on outcomes. Members of the audience actively engaged with the discussion and the profession shared ideas and experiences in a thought-provoking and constructive way.

The 2012 AWF forum was a huge success, provoking many ethical discussions and certainly gave attendees food for thought.

Become a member or log in to add this story to your CPD history

Defra shares new Sanitary and Phytosanitary guidance

News Story 1
 Defra has published guidance for the vet sector ahead of a proposed UK-EU Sanitary and Phytosanitary agreement.

The agreement, which will change the movement and trade of animals and related products, could see reductions in checks, paperwork and certification. As well as describing regulatory developments, the advice highlights the importance of animal ID, registration and traceability in disease control and other compliance arrangements.

The guidance can be found here. More detail is expected as negotiations progress. 

Click here for more...
News Shorts
Lords Committee opens Pet Parasite Medication inquiry

The House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee will launch its inquiry into Pet Parasite Medication (PPM) on Wednesday (3 June).

Focusing on treatments containing fipronil and imidacloprid, the inquiry will seek to understand distribution pathways and the impacts of PPM use and non-use on biodiversity and human health. It will also cover current regulation, monitoring, and the potential implications for pets and their owners.

The committee will hear evidence from environmental non-governmental organisations and research institutes. The public can follow the proceedings live on Parliament TV or in person in the Palace of Westminster.